U.S. intel report identified 3 Wuhan lab researchers who fell ill in November 2019

U.S. intel report identified 3 Wuhan lab researchers who fell ill in November 2019


WASHINGTON — A U.S. intelligence report identified three researchers at a Wuhan lab who sought treatment at a hospital after falling ill in November 2019, a source familiar with the matter tells NBC News.

The new details, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, add to the body of circumstantial evidence that supports a hypothesis that the Covid-19 virus may have spread to humans after it escaped from a Chinese research lab in Wuhan. But the evidence is far from conclusive.

This reporting adds a new level of detail to the information put out in a State Department fact sheet last year, which said the U.S. had confirmed that researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology had fallen ill.

“The U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both Covid-19 and common seasonal illnesses. This raises questions about the credibility of WIV senior researcher Shi Zhengli’s public claim that there was ‘zero infection’ among the WIV’s staff and students of SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-related viruses,” the fact sheet said.

In February, NBC News reported that the U.S. intelligence agencies had not ruled out the possibility of a lab accident, noting that a growing number of scientists are urging an investigation into that possibility. The other theory is that the virus was transmitted to humans through an animal host. After a year and half of looking, no such host has been identified.

U.S. officials say that unless China allows more access to records and people, they may never get to the bottom of it.

The P4 laboratory, left, at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China’s central Hubei province on April 17, 2020.Hector Retamal / AFP – Getty Images file

In April 2020, NBC News reported that the U.S. had indications as far back as November of a possible health crisis in Wuhan.

“The most important implications of this would be to show that Wuhan Insititute of Virology director Shi Zhengli was not being truthful when she said that no one in the institute had been ill in that time period,” said Jamie Metzl, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council former national security official in the Clinton administration who has been calling for an investigation into the lab theory.

“Because so much of the argument against a possible lab incident origin of the pandemic depends on the word of Dr. Shi, proving her an unreliable source would essentially destroy the most significant argument that’s been used to counter the lab incident.”

Metzl noted that Shi’s claim that there were no Chinese military experiments in the lab has also been contradicted by the State Department, which said last year that the lab “has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China’s military.”

Metzl is calling on the Biden administration to release the evidence used to make the assessments about the Chinese military and the three sick researchers.


Source link


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share This